Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 29 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
| By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 34 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 364 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |