Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 19 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1582 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 195 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |