Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 6 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 246 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |