Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 22 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Outlander has 189 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The Hyundai Santa FE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |