Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 774 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 297 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`329 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
| |