Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mitsubishi ASX) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 29 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |