Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Outlander torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 34 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 291 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |