Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.6 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 284 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |