Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 38 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 115 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 461 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |