Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 90 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 230 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 230 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 128 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1608 litres | 1950 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 342 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`529 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |