Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 90 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.8
6.4
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:
60 litres
60 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
1030 km in combined cycle
930 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway
1030 km on highway
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length.
Seats:
5 seats
7 seats
Trunk capacity:
128 litres
230 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:
no data
230 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:
128 litres
no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1608 litres
1950 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 342 litres).
Turning diameter:
10.6 meters
12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
