Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Renault Koleos 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Used also on Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 402 litres less trunk space than the Renault Koleos. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |