Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 422 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |