Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander and Alfa Romeo Stelvio have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Outlander torque is 90 NM less than Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.7 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Alfa Romeo Stelvio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Alfa Romeo Stelvio version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Alfa Romeo Stelvio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 397 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |