Mitsubishi Outlander 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 291 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 53 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |