Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 34 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 23 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 325 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 524 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |