Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Subaru Forester 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 7 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 91 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |