Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 214 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |