Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 23 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 563 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 356 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |