Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 11 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 143 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |