Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 62 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |