Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 345 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 23 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 1170 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1955 litres | |
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 629 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 264 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`620 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |