Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 28 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Santa FE 2004 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 850 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1691 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 409 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`240 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`665 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 685 kg | 535 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Hyundai Santa FE. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |