Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 335 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 2274 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 428 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 583 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |