Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 16 HP less power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 541 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 100 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |