Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 541 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 76 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |