Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs BMW X3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 64 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 61 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |