Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs BMW X3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 61 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`255 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| BMW X3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Outlander, so BMW X3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |