Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 4 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 13 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1841 litres | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has 131 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 150 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |