Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 294 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 24 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 15.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 5.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 870 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sorento, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 629 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 264 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |