Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Subaru Forester 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 3 NM more than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 91 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |