Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 15 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 736 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |