Mitsubishi Outlander 2007 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 281 NM | 241 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 45 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 32 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 103 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |