Mitsubishi Outlander 2001 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 142 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 8 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 13 NM more than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 583 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |