Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Subaru Forester 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 70 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 4 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |