Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 187 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.9 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`688 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |