Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 31 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 87 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1705 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 410 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |