Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 15 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 469 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1473 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 67 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |