Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 583 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |