Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 46 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1705 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`995 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`498 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 552 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |