Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004

 
Mitsubishi Outlander
2003 - 2005
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 176 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds10.8 seconds
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway760 km on highway
600 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 45 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space WagonInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ...  More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.64 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.62 m1.71 m
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller.
Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 402 litres527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1705 litres952 litres
Mitsubishi Outlander has 125 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 753 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9951`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv