Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 engine produces 65 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 and Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |