Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 134 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 7 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Magentis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 469 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1473 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 67 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |