Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 15 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 583 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |