Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Subaru Forester 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 17 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |