Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 100 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 167 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 774 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 53 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 917 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |