Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.6 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 8 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |