Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 19 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 77 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |