Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 241 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 13.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 22 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 242 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |