Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Outlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai Santa FE) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 335 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 122 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Outlander has 567 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |