Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 5 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 22 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 242 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |